Abstract (in inglese)
One of the most controversial aspects of the process of drafting and then implementing the National Recovery and Resilience Plan is unanimously identified in its relationship with territorial autonomies and, in particular, with the Regions, which seem to be relegated to a position of secondary importance.
The same cannot be said, however, for one of the constituent elements of the Regions, the territory, which not only assumes considerable prominence in the economy of the Plan in several respects, but of which the Plan itself seems to suggest a dynamic, policy-functional vision, not necessarily anchored to political-administrative boundaries and deserving of special attention.